Naturism Christianity Supports Naturism

Naturism Christianity supports Naturism

Part of


180. Genesis 1:27—1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

 The (naked) human body, created by God, in God’s own image, is basically decent, not inherently impure or sinful. The human body was created by God, and God can create no evil. It is made in God’s image, and the image of God is entirely pure and good.

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **********************************************

God made all creation pure and sinless and holy 100% acceptable to God pleasing because he made it. And in Gen 1:31 said “it was excellent in every way”

God wanted then and now 100% of creation to be 100% Open public NUDIST. Including all humans. But Adam and Eve rebelled and sinned against God and God design. Also with their new corrupt and confused, and misguided knowledge and with Serpent’s lies make more wrong choices. Most people still copy Adam and Eve corrupt thinking today and still have wrong conclusions.

Gen 1:31 NLT Then God looked over all he had made, and he saw that it was excellent in every way.                              

Gen 1:31 CEB God saw everything he had made: it was supremely good.                                                            

 Gen 1:31 GNT God looked at everything he had made, and he was very pleased.                                               

Gen 1:31 MSG God looked over everything he had made; it was so good, so very good!

Genesis 2:25 NLT

Now, although Adam and his wife were both naked, neither of them felt any shame.

God wanted them to be naked on purpose, his choice, his design. God wanted all humans to be NUDIST.

If Adam and Eve obeyed God and ate from “tree of (eternal) life”, all people would be 100% open public nudist and open public sex for all to see, with no man made shame and no man made guilt trips for all times on earth. God is very pro-nudist and pro-public sex with no shame. It God’s desire for all creation for all times. Only human rebelled, but all other creation still have this even today. (They did not get the corrupt, confused thinking.)

Titus 1:15 15 Unto the pure all things are pure : but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled .

God only put cloth on them because they wanted it , not God. God wants them nudist for all time.

Rom 14:14 14 I know and am perfectly sure on the authority of the Lord Jesus that no food, in and of itself, is wrong to eat. But if someone believes it is wrong, then for that person it is wrong.


God is Very Pro Nudity Pro Sex I Prove It

181. Genesis 1:31— Gen 1:31 NLT Then God looked over all he had made, and he saw that it was excellent in every way.                              

God saw that everything, including naked Adam and Eve, was good.

Sex In Heaven Will There Be


182. Genesis 3:7—7 At that moment, their eyes were opened, and they suddenly felt shame at their nakedness. So they strung fig leaves together around their hips to cover themselves.

Many scholars interpret the wearing of fig leaves as a continuation and expansion of the original sin, not a positive moral reaction to it.

Adam and Eve Put on the Fig Leaves Why

Adam Fall of Man Adds the Sin Principal

Hugh Kilmer explains: “Man wanted to put his life within his own control rather than God’s, so first he took the power of self-determination (knowledge of good and evil). Next, finding his body was not within his control, he controlled it artificially by hiding it. After he was expelled from paradise, he began to hunt and eat animals; then to gain complete control over other people, by killing them (the story of Cain and Abel).” 278

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **********************************************

Think about it,  Adam did the Romeo and Juliet thing.

Adam continue rebellion to God with confused, corrupt thinking. Adam blamed Eve for him making the wrong decision. 

Adam was on his “honeymoon” crazy in love with Eve, his perfect, super sexy sex partner, having lots of great sex and a great time making love all the time and then if Eve eat the forbidden fruit (remember --death punishment for Eve),  then Adam can’t live without Eve, his heart would break in half,  because he is so much in “love”,  “seeing stars”,  over his love for her so he copies Eve, and does what Eve wants, to make her happy, Thinking, so if Eve dies, then both of us will   die to show his love for her. When in love he do anything Eve ask him to do.

 But what happen? They did not die. They are still alive. O’ NO what did I do?

Adam is now in total shock—total surprise, they did not die.

 So to avoid having Eve have all that love power over Adam , thinking with his penis head and not his real head, Adam thinks to cover up Eve great beautiful nude body which Adam greatly loved and greatly love the great sex so much he was not thinking straight, thinking only with his penis and made the wrong decision.

So now he sinned against God so he is also trying to hide behind bushes and trees from God so he does not have to face his punishment.

Being NUDIST is NOT a sin.

Having lots of open public sex is NOT a sin.

Loving Eve a lot was NOT a sin.

But sinning against God is a sin.

So,  What have we learned?

1.)  Have lots of open public NUDITY, greatly enjoy seeing lots of sexy women.

2.)  Have lots of great open public sex

3.)  Love many sexy women, not just one,  because if she leads you the wrong way just say NO and go and have sex with your other beautiful sexy women to NOT let you penis do all the thinking. Masturbate or have sex with people you can to get sexual release so you think clearer..

4.)  King David and King Solomon did the same mistake. David had to have that one super special married women he should have just got a single one and had lot of sex with them. Same with Solomon he had those super sexy pagan Egyptian women who mislead him to disobey God.

5.)  So can we learn from Adam and David and Solomon mistakes? Have lots of NUDITY, and Lots of sex with many women, but careful not to let them over power you and sin against God.


183. Genesis 3:10— 10 He replied, "I heard you, so I hid. I was afraid because I was naked."

Many scholars believe that Adam and Eve’s sense of shame came not from their nakedness, which God had created and called good, but from their knowledge of having disobeyed God.

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **********************************************

They got total confused, corrupt,  sinful, backwards Thinking opposite from God’s thinking. God made and said 100% nudity was very good or excellent in every way, backwards, corrupt thinking said the opposite of what God said. God wants all people to be nudist with ON shame off any kind.


184. An innate, God-given sense of shame related to nakedness is contradicted by the existence of numerous indigenous societies in which nudity is the rule and a sense of shame is totally absent, and by the lack of shame felt by naked children.

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **********************************************

The shame clearly did not come from God at all. It came from serpent lies and man’s confused, corrupt , sinful thinking opposite from God’s thinking. God still want all people to be nudist just like all the rest of God’s creation are all nudist.

Titus 1:15 15 Unto the pure all things are pure : but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled .

God only put cloth on them because they wanted it , not God. God wants them nudist for all time.

Rom 14:14 14 I know and am perfectly sure on the authority of the Lord Jesus that no food, in and of itself, is wrong to eat. But if someone believes it is wrong, then for that person it is wrong.



185. Genesis 3:11— 11 "Who told you that you were naked?" the LORD God asked. "Have you eaten the fruit I commanded you not to eat?"

It was disobedience that came between Adam and Eve and God, not nakedness. The scriptures themselves treat Adam and Eve’s nudity as an incidental issue.

Robert Bahr observes that “when Adam and Eve disobeyed God, they grew ashamed of what they had done and attempted to hide themselves from God, who was not the least bit concerned with their nakedness but was mightily unhappy with their disobedience.” 279

186. Genesis 3:21—God made garments of skins for Adam, but the Bible does not say the state of nakedness is being condemned. Because of the Fall, Adam and Eve were no longer in Eden and were thus subject to the varieties of weather and climate, and God knew they would need clothes. God loved and cared for them even after they had sinned.

Herb Seal notes that God provided a covering by slaying an innocent animal: the first prototype of the innocent one slain to act as a “covering” for sinners.280

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

God’s thinking did not change, but Adam and Eve thinking changed. Nudity is still God’s desire but with NO shame and God did not change His thinking.

Titus 1:15 and Rom 14:14 would apply to Adam and Eve thinking. Also Adam had very great shame over rebelling and disobedience to God and he blames Eve for that. Why because Eve was so sexy and looked so good naked and they so great sex that Adam could not think with his head only with his penis head and would do anything Eve asked him to do to keep Eve his lover happy. The Romeo and Juliet crazy in love thing they choice to die together if they can’t have each other.

Titus 1:15 15 Unto the pure all things are pure : but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled .

God only put cloth on them because they wanted it , not God. God wants them nudist for all time.

Rom 14:14 14 I know and am perfectly sure on the authority of the Lord Jesus that no food, in and of itself, is wrong to eat. But if someone believes it is wrong, then for that person it is wrong.


187. To assume that because God made garments He was condemning nudity makes as much sense as concluding that because God made clouds which blot out the sun He was condemning sunshine.



188. Genesis 9:22-24—Noah was both drunk and naked, but Ham was the one who was cursed—when he dishonored his father, by calling attention to Noah’s state, and making light of it.
The shame of Noah’s “nakedness” was much more than just being undressed. It was his dehumanized, drunken stupor which was shameful. Ham’s offense was not merely seeing his father in this shameful state, but gossiping about it, effectively destroying Noah’s reputation, cultural status, and authority as a father figure. In the story, Shem and Japheth were blessed for coming to the defense of their father’s honor. Rather than joining Ham in his boasting, they reverently covered their father’s shame.281

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

Think about a person who is in a “drunken stupor” condition. Many times they puck up all over themselves and can’t even think or even talk straight. Very disrespectful condition for anyone to be in. Many time fall down and have blood face etc.


189. Exodus 20:26—The Priest’s nakedness was not to be exposed because it would create dissonance between his social role, in which he was to be seen as sexually neutral, and his biological status as a sexual being.
The Priest’s costume represented his social role; to be exposed in that context would be inappropriate and distracting.282

Rita Poretsky writes: “Personhood, original sexual energy, and physical nakedness may be either in synchrony with social institutions or in disharmony… . Nakedness is a nakedness of self in a social context, not just a nakedness of body.” 283

On the other hand, it was quite appropriate for David to dance essentially naked in public to celebrate the return of the Ark of the Covenant (II Samuel 6:14-23).

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

This is a people hang up not a God hang up, God is just doing a Rom 14:14. Titus 1:15 type of thing. This is just a carry over from their personal nudity and sexual  hang ups. If they were always nude then seeing a man nude would be no big deal. But if you never see anyone nude as the normal thing, then it become an oddity and abnormal thing,  like in our anti-nude society we live in USA. If a person undress out in the open it becomes a big deal, because it becomes an oddity instead of the normal. But in a nudist resort where everyone walks around nude, it would be the normal and no big deal and no oddity.




190. Leviticus 18:6-19—Here and throughout the Old Testament and Torah, the expression “uncover the nakedness of” (as it is literally translated in the King James Version) is a euphemism for “have sexual relations with.” The prohibitions do not refer to nudity per se.284

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

(inkaboutit4u reply---very misleading by the KingJames writers to hint or to create an attitude that anything was wrong with nudity, when there is NOTHING wrong with open public nudity per our creator God.)

191. I Samuel 19:23-24—Jewish prophets were commonly naked—so commonly that when Saul stripped off his clothes and prophesied, no one considered his nakedness remarkable, but everyone immediately assumed that he must be a prophet also.

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

(inkaboutit4u reply---This is a connect with nudity as being  holiness or man from Godis speaking, very pro nudity, very positive)

192. II Samuel 6:14-23—King David danced nearly naked in the City of David to celebrate the return of the ark, in full view of all the citizens of the city. Michal criticized his public nudity and was rebuffed.
King David was not strictly naked—he wore a “linen ephod,” a sort of short apron or close-fitting, armless, outer vest, extending at the most down to the hips. Ephods were part of the vestments worn by Jewish priests. They hid nothing.285

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

(inkaboutit4u reply---David was dancing in front of some very young girl showing off his gentiles and his wife Michal saw him from a window and rebuked him for doing that and God greatly punished Michal his wife for rebuking David that he made Michal unable to have children. A major punishment in that day for a women. God clearly did not punish David in any way for open public showing off his gentiles for all to see. Again shows that God has NOT changed his thinking about all people being nude with NO shame, as is all of God creation.


193. Isaiah 20:2-3—God directly commanded Isaiah to loose the sackcloth from his hips, and he went naked and barefoot for three years.

The prophet Micah may have done the same thing (see Micah 1:8).

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

Again clearly show God is very pro-nudity and that open public NUDITY is God desire.


194. Song of Solomon repeatedly expresses appreciation for the naked body.

·         Song_of_Solomon_from_Godrules_Net   

·         Song_Of_Solomon_Married_Man_loves_Single_Girl   

·         SOS_Exotic_Bible_Chapter

195. Every Biblical association of nakedness with shame is in reference to a sin already committed. One cannot hide from God behind literal or figurative clothing. All stand naked before God.286

196. Nakedness cannot automatically be equated with sexual sin.

Linking nudity with sexual sin, to the exclusion of all else, makes as much sense as insisting that fire can only be connected to the destruction of property and life, and is therefore immoral. Sin comes not from nakedness, but from how the state of nakedness is used.

 Ian Barbour writes: “No aspect of man is evil in itself, but only in its misuse. The inherent goodness of the material order, in which man’s being fully participates, is, as we shall see, a corollary of the doctrine of creation.” 287

Pope John Paul II agrees that nudity, in and of itself, is not sinful. …288

197. Nakedness cannot automatically be associated with evil lust.

It is not reasonable to cover the apples in the marketplace just because someone might may be tempted by gluttony, nor is it necessary to ban money because someone might be overcome by greed. Nor is it reasonable to ban nudity, simply because an individual might be tempted to lust.

Furthermore, appreciation for the beauty of a member of the other sex, nude or otherwise, cannot be equated automatically with lust. Only if desire is added does appreciation become lust, and therefore sin. Even then, it is the one who lusts, not the object of lust, who has sinned.

Bathesheba was never rebuked for bathing, but David for lusting (II Samuel 11:2-12:12).

Pope John Paul II writes: “There are circumstances in which nakedness is not immodest. …289

Margaret Miles observes that “Nakedness and sexuality or lust were seldom associated in patristic writings.” 290

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************


198. Many historical church leaders have disassociated nudity with sexual immodesty.

St. Thomas Aquinus, for example, defined an immodest act as one done with a lustful intention.291 Therefore, someone who disrobes for the sole purpose of bathing or recreating cannot be accused of immodesty.

Pope John Paul II writes: “Sexual modesty cannot then in any simple way be identified with the use of clothing, nor shamelessness with the absence of clothing and total or partial nakedness… . Immodesty is present only when nakedness plays a negative role with regard to the value of the person…,. There are certain objective situations in which even total nudity of the body is not immodest.” 292

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************


199. Through Christ, the Christian is returned spiritually to the same sinless, shameless state Adam and Eve enjoyed in Eden (Genesis 2:25). There is no question that their nakedness was not sinful. When God creates, nakedness is good. It follows that when God re-creates, nakedness is also good.

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

In Christ we are a “NEW CREATION” the same as when Adam and Eve were sinless before the fall, they were God’s or Christ’s “NEW CREATION” in God, or in Christ because Christ created all things per Jn 1:1


·         God_Gave_Sexual_Freedom_to_All_Creation   

·         God_is_Opposite_What_They_Teach_Godrules_Net   

·         God_is_Very_Pro_Nudity_Pro_Sex_I_Prove_It   



200. The Bible says plainly that “sexual immorality” is sin. Healthy Naturism, however, is entirely consistent for the Christian, who has “crucified the sinful nature with its passions and desires.” (Galatians 5:24)

***************Inkaboutit4u reply:  **************************************************************

They have the wrong definition for “sexual immorality” which equals, “Fornication”  They greatly confuse and mislead people by calling “Fornication”, “sexual immorality” . Sexuality is not the key problem, the key problem is misusing their God given sexual freedom God gave to all creation at creation, misused by joining in the sexual worship of a pagan fertility god so they get Blessings  from this pagan fertility god to get good fertile farm crops and more fertile animal and more fertile people to have more children to help farm and make more money. God gave all people sexual freedom to enjoy lots of sexual enjoy with lots of people over a live time. God is NOT bother by people sexual pleasure but is greatly bother by using it to  join in the worship of a pagan fertility god. Compare 1 Cor 10:8 to Nu 25: 1-9  Nu 31:17 this is correct Bible definition for fornication, not the wrong Bible dictionary definition which is greatly misleading and totally wrong.. explained in my web pages below.





201. The Bible calls for purity of heart. Anyone who thinks it is impossible to be pure of heart while nude is ignorant of the realities of nudism, and anyone who believes that it is wrong even for the pure of heart to be nude has fallen into legalism, a vice which St. Paul repeatedly denounces.293
St. Paul writes: “See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ… . Since you died with Christ to the basic principles of the world, why, as though you still belonged to it, do you submit to its rules: ‘Do not handle! Do not taste! Do not touch!’? These are all destined to perish with use, because they are based on human commands and teachings. Such regulations indeed have an appearance of wisdom, with their self-imposed worship, their false humility and their harsh treatment of the body, but they lack any value in restraining sensual indulgence… . Therefore, as God’s chosen people, holy and dearly loved, clothe yourselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience.” (Colossians 2:8, 20-23; 3:12)

202. Clothes-compulsiveness creates an unwholesome schism between one’s spirit and body. A Christian morality should deal with the person as a whole, healing both spirit and body.

203. Nudity has often been used in the Christian tradition as symbolic of renouncing the world to follow Christ.
Margaret Miles writes: “In the thirteenth century, Saint Bernard of Clairvoux popularized the idea of nudity as symbolic imitation of Christ; it took Saint Francis to act out this metaphor. Francis announced his betrothal to Lady Poverty [i.e. his renunciation of material possessions] by publicly stripping off his clothing and flinging it at the feet of his protesting father” and the local bishop.294 Several Christian sects have practiced nudity as part of their faith, including the German Brethren of the Free Spirit, in the thirteenth century; the Picards, in fifteenth century France; and, most famously, the Adamites, in the early fifteenth century Netherlands.295

204. Many other faiths also support nudity, both historically and in current practice.
For example, the “Digambar” or “sky-clad” monks of Digambar Jainism have gone completely naked as part of their ascetic tradition for 2500 years, though nudity is rare in the dominant Hindu religion. Many other (males-only) Hindu religious orders also practice ritualistic nudity or near-nudity, as they have for hundreds or thousands of years. Tribal Hindus held an annual nude worship service attracting 100,000 in Chandragutti, India until 1987, when it was stopped by the police, in reaction to violence which had erupted the previous year when social workers tried to force clothing on the participants.296




© 2018 • Powered by BasicPages